The Nationals’ grassroots members have voted to ditch net zero, setting the scene to formally scrap the target at a meeting on Sunday morning.
“We believe in reducing emissions, but not at any cost,” the Nationals leader, David Littleproud, told the party’s federal council on Saturday.
A motion at the meeting for the party to “abandon its support for a net zero mandate” was passed.
The junior Coalition partner is likely to find a “compromise” position on climate change.
Sign up: AU Breaking News email
A bitter brawl has erupted between the Liberal and National parties – and conservative and moderate factions – about whether to keep the net zero target, prompting speculation the Coalition could split.
Barnaby Joyce has left the Nationals partyroom over the issue – he is still a member of the party, Littleproud confirmed on Saturday, and was welcome to return to the partyroom.
Littleproud has called a partyroom meeting for 9am Sunday to finalise the party’s net zero position.
“We’re not walking away from reducing emissions, but we can do it a better, fairer, cheaper way,” he said.
“We can align ourselves with the world as the world pivots from an arbitrary target to using common sense, making sure that they don’t destroy their economies.”
He also said he “passionately” believes in nuclear energy.
Littleproud said while the grassroots position would inform the parliamentary position, “no one should take for granted” what the partyroom would do.
“This is the next phase in the process,” he said. “If there’s a better way, then we should explore it.”
He said adaptation could play a role alongside mitigation and said that claims this meant the Nationals do not believe in climate change would be “puerile”.
He said he and the Liberal leader, Sussan Ley, would work through a process and that the parties still had “a lot of similarities”.
“We will respect the time that it will take for the Liberal party to get to a position and then we’ll form a committee to be able to work through where our similarities [lie] and if there are any differences,” he said.
The deputy leader, Kevin Hogan, said there was a majority view in the room that climate change was real, emissions had to be reduced and that affordability and reliability had to be taken into account.
Senator Bridget McKenzie described the goals as “aggressive targets”.
“We’ve always said that net zero was never going to be net zero cost,” she said.
She also said the Nationals and the Liberal parties had huge differences, which is why they are separate parties.
Asked about the Coalition potentially splitting, she said the last time they split was not the first and “probably wouldn’t be the last”.
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
Privacy Notice: Newsletters may contain information about charities, online ads, and content funded by outside parties. If you do not have an account, we will create a guest account for you on theguardian.com to send you this newsletter. You can complete full registration at any time. For more information about how we use your data see our Privacy Policy. We use Google reCaptcha to protect our website and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
after newsletter promotion
Littleproud was asked about concerns from a South Australian youth delegation that the move would see votes lost to Labor in regional Australia.
He said he had seen the effects of floods himself, but that “we can’t do it all ourselves”.
“Net zero is not the only way to actually address climate change,” he said.
The Liberal party is still considering its final position.
“We’re not going to accept the government’s net zero at any cost,” Ley said on Friday.
In Paris in 2015, more than 190 countries – including Australia – signed an agreement to keep global heating “well below 2C” and to try to limit warming to 1.5C in an effort to tackle the climate change that is already having devastating effects.
The Coalition, under former prime minister Scott Morrison, committed to supporting net zero in 2021.
Australia’s 2030 target is to cut its emissions by 47% from 2005 levels; by 62% to 70% by 2035; and to reach net zero by 2050.
Last week, Coalition MPs were told by conservative thinktank the Centre for Independent Studies that “heat deaths aren’t a thing”.
Heat-related deaths have already increased and will continue to increase.
They were also told that 32% of voters wanted to keep net zero, 52% wanted the target “changed to more flexible, realistic and achievable goals” and 16% wanted it “scrapped entirely”.
According to the latest Essential poll, 44% of Australians want net zero, 27% are opposed and 29% are neither for or against the target.
The poll found 49% of Coalition supporters want the opposition to adopt more progressive positions, with 23% in favour of the current positions and 29% wanting more conservative policies.
