Close Menu
  • Home
  • Market News
    • Crude Oil Prices
    • Brent vs WTI
    • Futures & Trading
    • OPEC Announcements
  • Company & Corporate
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Earnings Reports
    • Executive Moves
    • ESG & Sustainability
  • Geopolitical & Global
    • Middle East
    • North America
    • Europe & Russia
    • Asia & China
    • Latin America
  • Supply & Disruption
    • Pipeline Disruptions
    • Refinery Outages
    • Weather Events (hurricanes, floods)
    • Labor Strikes & Protest Movements
  • Policy & Regulation
    • U.S. Energy Policy
    • EU Carbon Targets
    • Emissions Regulations
    • International Trade & Sanctions
  • Tech
    • Energy Transition
    • Hydrogen & LNG
    • Carbon Capture
    • Battery / Storage Tech
  • ESG
    • Climate Commitments
    • Greenwashing News
    • Net-Zero Tracking
    • Institutional Divestments
  • Financial
    • Interest Rates Impact on Oil
    • Inflation + Demand
    • Oil & Stock Correlation
    • Investor Sentiment

Subscribe to Updates

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news

Subscribe my Newsletter for New Posts & tips Let's stay updated!

What's Hot

South Korea Moves Toward Mandatory ISSB-Aligned Climate Disclosures For Large KOSPI Firms

March 5, 2026

What the fallout from the Iran war means for Havana

March 5, 2026

JP Morgan Warns DFC Insurance Cap is Too Small for the Risk

March 5, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Threads
Oil Market Cap – Global Oil & Energy News, Data & Analysis
  • Home
  • Market News
    • Crude Oil Prices
    • Brent vs WTI
    • Futures & Trading
    • OPEC Announcements
  • Company & Corporate
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Earnings Reports
    • Executive Moves
    • ESG & Sustainability
  • Geopolitical & Global
    • Middle East
    • North America
    • Europe & Russia
    • Asia & China
    • Latin America
  • Supply & Disruption
    • Pipeline Disruptions
    • Refinery Outages
    • Weather Events (hurricanes, floods)
    • Labor Strikes & Protest Movements
  • Policy & Regulation
    • U.S. Energy Policy
    • EU Carbon Targets
    • Emissions Regulations
    • International Trade & Sanctions
  • Tech
    • Energy Transition
    • Hydrogen & LNG
    • Carbon Capture
    • Battery / Storage Tech
  • ESG
    • Climate Commitments
    • Greenwashing News
    • Net-Zero Tracking
    • Institutional Divestments
  • Financial
    • Interest Rates Impact on Oil
    • Inflation + Demand
    • Oil & Stock Correlation
    • Investor Sentiment
Oil Market Cap – Global Oil & Energy News, Data & Analysis
Home » SBTi Proposes More Flexible Corporate Net Zero Standard
Sustainability & ESG

SBTi Proposes More Flexible Corporate Net Zero Standard

omc_adminBy omc_adminNovember 10, 2025No Comments5 Mins Read
Share
Facebook Twitter Pinterest Threads Bluesky Copy Link


The Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) announced the release of its updated draft Corporate Net-Zero Standard V2, its planned update to its key standard to assess, certify and track companies’ decarbonization commitments to achieve net zero emissions and to support science-based climate target setting.

According to the SBTi, the new draft aims to enable more companies to set net zero goals by “making science-based climate action more accessible and actionable,” while simultaneously balancing the need to maintain alignment with global climate goals. Among the key changes introduced in the new draft is a “a menu of options for companies to drive down their carbon footprint,” according to SBTi CEO David Kennedy, including multiple pathways allowed for target setting for direct emissions reductions, and clearer rules for the use of instruments such as carbon credits to reach decarbonization goals.

The SBTi was founded in 2015 with the goal to establish science-based environmental target setting as a standard corporate practice. The organizations’ key functions include defining and promoting best practice in emissions reductions and net-zero targets in line with climate science, providing technical assistance to companies who set science-based targets, and providing companies with independent assessment and validation of their emissions reduction targets. To date, nearly 12,000 companies have set science-based emissions reduction targets with the SBTi, or made commitments to do so.

The organization’s flagship first Corporate Net-Zero Standard was published in 2021, and the SBTi announced plans early last year to update the standard.

In March 2025, the SBTi released its initial draft of the new V2 standard, and launched a consultation into a series of the changes introduced, including proposals to add allow multiple methods for reaching emissions targets, require explicit Scope 2 (purchased energy) emissions targets, require large companies to set Scope 3 value chain emissions goals. The initial draft also included a consultation on options to address residual emissions on the pathway to net zero, including the introduction of interim carbon removal targets, as well as formally recognizing companies which are investing in Beyond Value Chain Mitigation (BVCM).

Following feedback from the first draft’s public consultation and expert working groups, the SBTi’s new draft further develops and refines the proposals, including an update to the key ambition for companies, changing from “Companies shall publicly commit to reaching net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by no later than 2050,” to “Companies shall set an ambition to transition their operations and value chains to align with the goal to be net-zero by no later than 2050,” with the SBTi noting that the new language avoids confusion from the word “commitment,” focusing instead on “the company’s overarching intention to reach net-zero by 2050.”

For direct operations Scope 1 emissions, the new draft introduces 3 approaches for target setting – including reducing emissions on a linear pathway to net-zero, increasing the share of low-carbon activities over time, and implementing Asset Decarbonization Plans to decarbonize assets based on technological readiness. The draft also adds some flexibility and clarity to Scope 2 target setting requirements, including maintaining requirements for all companies to set near-term targets, but making long-term targets optional for smaller companies, specifying criteria for near-term targets, adding mechanisms for limited amounts of electricity, heat, steam and cooling to be excluded from the near-term targets, and improved criteria for purchasing low carbon electricity.

The proposed updated standard’s Scope 3 approach focuses on addressing priority emissions sources that can have the greatest impact, while allowing flexibility, with the SBTi noting that value chain emissions have formed one of the most significant barriers to companies’ setting of science-based targets. The new draft increases focus from the initial draft on targeting the highest-priority emissions in the near-term while exclusions for lower-impact activities and areas where influence is limited, while also introducing three options for Scope 3 target setting – including “emissions intensity,” “activity alignment,” and “counterparty alignment” – noting that the options “reflect the diversity of value chain emissions and the different mitigation strategies companies use across their value chains.”

One of the key changes in the new draft is the formalization of the integration of the use of environmental attribute certificates (EACs), such as carbon credits or energy and commodity certificates, while including strict conditions. For example, Scope 2 targets can include matching using low-carbon electricity EACs that are purchased in the same region as the company’s electricity consumption, while Scope 3 targets may use EACs on a limited basis where direct supplier engagement or physical traceability is not feasible.

The SBTi’s new draft standard also adds a new recognition mechanism aimed at incentivizing companies by highlighting early, voluntary action to address ongoing emissions, introducing a “leadership” category, which includes large companies addressing 100% of their ongoing scope 1-3 emissions, or smaller companies addressing 100% of Scope 1 and 2 emissions.

Additionally, the new draft also includes new requirements for large companies (or Category A companies, which include large companies in all countries and medium-sized companies in high-income countries), including a requirement for the publication of credible transition plans within 12 months of target validation, as well as to address an increasing portion of ongoing emissions,  or those not yet reduced on the pathway towards net zero by 2050, from 2035 through a portfolio of carbon removals.

David Kennedy, Chief Executive Officer at the Science Based Targets initiative, said:

“Businesses are driving global decarbonization, and will be key to achieving our climate objectives. Taking science-based action both reduces emissions and manages transition risks, maintaining competitiveness and offering growth opportunities in a carbon-constrained world.”

The SBTi’s consultation on the new draft will run through December 8, 2025, with plans for the Standard to be published for use in 2026. Click here to access the draft and consultation.



Source link

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest Bluesky Threads Tumblr Telegram Email
omc_admin
  • Website

Related Posts

Korea Plans Mandatory Sustainability Reporting Beginning in 2028

March 5, 2026

Global sea levels have been underestimated due to poor modelling, research suggests | Oceans

March 4, 2026

EU Commission Unveils Industrial Accelerator Act with New Made-in-EU Requirements for Cleantech Procurement

March 4, 2026
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Top Posts

Federal Reserve cuts key rate for first time this year

September 17, 202513 Views

Inflation or jobs: Federal Reserve officials are divided over competing concerns

August 14, 20259 Views

Oil tanker rates to stay strong into 2026 as sanctions remove ships for hire – Oil & Gas 360

December 16, 20258 Views
Don't Miss

South Korea Moves Toward Mandatory ISSB-Aligned Climate Disclosures For Large KOSPI Firms

By omc_adminMarch 5, 2026

South Korea proposes mandatory sustainability reporting for KOSPI-listed firms with assets above KRW 30 trillion…

Are We Heading for an All-Out War in the Middle East?

March 5, 2026

UK operators meet with Chancellor Reeves on junking Energy Profits Levy

March 4, 2026

Seadrill alliance targets remote DP operations for offshore drilling

March 4, 2026
Top Trending

Korea Plans Mandatory Sustainability Reporting Beginning in 2028

By omc_adminMarch 5, 2026

Global sea levels have been underestimated due to poor modelling, research suggests | Oceans

By omc_adminMarch 4, 2026

EU Commission Unveils Industrial Accelerator Act with New Made-in-EU Requirements for Cleantech Procurement

By omc_adminMarch 4, 2026
Most Popular

The 5 Best 65-Inch TVs of 2025

July 3, 202515 Views

AI’s Next Bottleneck Isn’t Just Chips — It’s the Power Grid: Goldman

November 14, 202514 Views

The Layoffs List of 2025: Meta, Microsoft, Block, and More

May 9, 202510 Views
Our Picks

JP Morgan Warns DFC Insurance Cap is Too Small for the Risk

March 5, 2026

Britain’s National Grid Awards $4B Supply Contracts for EGL3

March 5, 2026

EU Sees No Energy Supply Concern from Mideast War for Now

March 5, 2026

Subscribe to Updates

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news

Subscribe my Newsletter for New Posts & tips Let's stay updated!

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us
  • DMCA
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
© 2026 oilmarketcap. Designed by oilmarketcap.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.