Close Menu
  • Home
  • Market News
    • Crude Oil Prices
    • Brent vs WTI
    • Futures & Trading
    • OPEC Announcements
  • Company & Corporate
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Earnings Reports
    • Executive Moves
    • ESG & Sustainability
  • Geopolitical & Global
    • Middle East
    • North America
    • Europe & Russia
    • Asia & China
    • Latin America
  • Supply & Disruption
    • Pipeline Disruptions
    • Refinery Outages
    • Weather Events (hurricanes, floods)
    • Labor Strikes & Protest Movements
  • Policy & Regulation
    • U.S. Energy Policy
    • EU Carbon Targets
    • Emissions Regulations
    • International Trade & Sanctions
  • Tech
    • Energy Transition
    • Hydrogen & LNG
    • Carbon Capture
    • Battery / Storage Tech
  • ESG
    • Climate Commitments
    • Greenwashing News
    • Net-Zero Tracking
    • Institutional Divestments
  • Financial
    • Interest Rates Impact on Oil
    • Inflation + Demand
    • Oil & Stock Correlation
    • Investor Sentiment

Subscribe to Updates

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news

Subscribe my Newsletter for New Posts & tips Let's stay updated!

What's Hot

WTI Oil prices jump on fears Iran attack will lead disruption

March 1, 2026

OPEC+ Approves Modest Output Hike as Iran War Jolts Oil Markets

March 1, 2026

Oil tankers attacked near Strait of Hormuz as Iran conflict disrupts shipping

March 1, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Threads
Oil Market Cap – Global Oil & Energy News, Data & Analysis
  • Home
  • Market News
    • Crude Oil Prices
    • Brent vs WTI
    • Futures & Trading
    • OPEC Announcements
  • Company & Corporate
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Earnings Reports
    • Executive Moves
    • ESG & Sustainability
  • Geopolitical & Global
    • Middle East
    • North America
    • Europe & Russia
    • Asia & China
    • Latin America
  • Supply & Disruption
    • Pipeline Disruptions
    • Refinery Outages
    • Weather Events (hurricanes, floods)
    • Labor Strikes & Protest Movements
  • Policy & Regulation
    • U.S. Energy Policy
    • EU Carbon Targets
    • Emissions Regulations
    • International Trade & Sanctions
  • Tech
    • Energy Transition
    • Hydrogen & LNG
    • Carbon Capture
    • Battery / Storage Tech
  • ESG
    • Climate Commitments
    • Greenwashing News
    • Net-Zero Tracking
    • Institutional Divestments
  • Financial
    • Interest Rates Impact on Oil
    • Inflation + Demand
    • Oil & Stock Correlation
    • Investor Sentiment
Oil Market Cap – Global Oil & Energy News, Data & Analysis
Home » Korean Battery Companies Overcome Slump Through ESS Expansion in the U.S.
Battery / Storage Tech

Korean Battery Companies Overcome Slump Through ESS Expansion in the U.S.

omc_adminBy omc_adminMay 1, 2025No Comments4 Mins Read
Share
Facebook Twitter Pinterest Threads Bluesky Copy Link


The three Korean battery companies, mired in losses due to the electric vehicle chasm (temporary demand stagnation), are accelerating their energy storage system (ESS) business this year to find a breakthrough.
As the Donald Trump administration strongly checks Chinese batteries using tariffs as a weapon, they are strategizing to reclaim market leadership from Chinese companies. Korean companies are expanding ESS production lines in the United States and focusing on cost reduction to minimize the impact of U.S. tariffs.

Among the three battery companies — LG Energy Solution, Samsung SDI, and SK On — which announced their Q1 results by April 30, only LG Energy Solution recorded an operating profit. LG Energy Solution’s Q1 sales increased by 2.2% year-on-year to 6.265 trillion won, while operating profit surged by 138.2%, turning from a loss (-225.5 billion won) in Q4 last year to a profit.

Although the battery market is still constrained by the chasm, LG Energy Solution’s early securing of U.S. production facilities and subsidies contributed to its profit turnaround. In Q1, LG Energy Solution received 457.7 billion won in Advanced Manufacturing Production Credit (AMPC) subsidies under the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) from the U.S. government. However, excluding this, it would have incurred a loss of 83 billion won.

Samsung SDI and SK On, latecomers compared to LG Energy Solution, could not avoid operating losses in Q1. Samsung SDI recorded an operating loss of 434.1 billion won despite receiving 109.4 billion won in AMPC subsidies. This was due to reduced battery shipments as automakers, their customers, engaged in intensive inventory adjustments following decreased electric vehicle demand.

SK On also recorded an operating loss of 299.3 billion won in Q1. Despite receiving 170.8 billion won in AMPC benefits, it could not avoid a deficit. Both Samsung SDI and SK On have been in the red for two consecutive quarters since Q4 last year.

Korean battery companies predicted that difficult business conditions would continue in Q2 due to the combination of the electric vehicle chasm and U.S. tariff policies. Lee Chang-sil, chief financial officer (CFO) of LG Energy Solution, said in a conference call, “In Q2, due to policies such as tariffs, automakers’ overall inventory management stance is expected to be conservative, making a certain level of sales decline inevitable compared to the previous quarter.”

The ESS market is gaining attention as an escape route for Korean battery companies stuck in a slump. Unlike electric vehicle batteries, the ESS battery market is showing high growth due to the spread of renewable energy and the development of artificial intelligence (AI) industries. According to SNE Research, the global ESS battery market is expected to grow from 300GWh this year to over 610GWh by 2035, with an average annual growth rate of 7.7%. The market size is expected to expand to $39.5 billion (about 57.8 trillion won) by 2030.

The U.S. government’s strengthening checks on Chinese batteries also present an opportunity for Korean battery companies. Chinese companies have dominated the North American ESS battery market, including the U.S., with low prices, but as they become subject to high tariffs, expectations are growing that Korean batteries produced locally in the U.S. will replace them. Last year, out of the 78GWh North American ESS battery demand, Chinese companies like CATL and BYD accounted for 68GWh, or 87% of the share.

However, the situation is expected to change rapidly under the Trump administration. The U.S. has imposed a high tariff of 155.9% on Chinese ESS batteries and plans to further increase it to 173.4% next year. With high tariffs, Chinese batteries will inevitably lose their price competitiveness.

Korean battery companies are speeding up the establishment of ESS production bases, judging that they will benefit from local production in the U.S. LG Energy Solution has halted construction of its ESS factory in Arizona and instead reorganized its supply chain to produce lithium iron phosphate (LFP) batteries for ESS at its Michigan factory. The production line is set to start operations in Q2 this year, about a year earlier than initially planned.

SK On is also considering converting some of its electric vehicle battery production lines in Georgia, USA, to ESS LFP production lines. Samsung SDI is considering setting up ESS battery production lines in the U.S. as well. Kim Yoon-tae, vice president of Samsung SDI’s Management Support Office, said in a conference call on April 25, “ESS batteries have a high sales proportion in the U.S., and currently, we are producing outside the U.S. and exporting to the U.S., so we are inevitably affected by tariffs. We will respond well to this part in consultation with our customers.”

businesskorea.co.kr



Source link

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest Bluesky Threads Tumblr Telegram Email
omc_admin
  • Website

Related Posts

India says companies have licences to import rare earth magnets from China

October 30, 2025

Drax Group strikes £157m deal for three battery energy storage systems in Hull and Scotland

October 30, 2025

Saudi Arabia to beat China in battery energy storage costs by next year: Report

October 29, 2025
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Top Posts

Federal Reserve cuts key rate for first time this year

September 17, 202513 Views

Inflation or jobs: Federal Reserve officials are divided over competing concerns

August 14, 20259 Views

Oil tanker rates to stay strong into 2026 as sanctions remove ships for hire – Oil & Gas 360

December 16, 20258 Views
Don't Miss

Oil tankers attacked near Strait of Hormuz as Iran conflict disrupts shipping

By omc_adminMarch 1, 2026

(Bloomberg) – Two tankers were attacked near the mouth of the Persian Gulf, increasing the…

OPEC+ to boost oil production 206,000 bpd as Iran conflict threatens supply

March 1, 2026

Oil markets on edge after Trump strike on Iran threatens Hormuz flows

March 1, 2026

How will strikes on Iran affect global energy flows?

February 28, 2026
Top Trending

ESG Today: Week in Review

By omc_adminMarch 1, 2026

Winter getting shorter in 80% of major US cities, new data shows | US weather

By omc_adminFebruary 27, 2026

Trump officials move to kill system that protects US from chemical disasters | US Environmental Protection Agency

By omc_adminFebruary 27, 2026
Most Popular

The 5 Best 65-Inch TVs of 2025

July 3, 202515 Views

AI’s Next Bottleneck Isn’t Just Chips — It’s the Power Grid: Goldman

November 14, 202514 Views

The Layoffs List of 2025: Meta, Microsoft, Block, and More

May 9, 202510 Views
Our Picks

PDVSA, African Energy Chamber sign MoU to boost oil and gas investment

March 1, 2026

Talos Losses Deepen | Rigzone

March 1, 2026

Tankers Halt Near Hormuz After Attacks

February 28, 2026

Subscribe to Updates

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news

Subscribe my Newsletter for New Posts & tips Let's stay updated!

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us
  • DMCA
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
© 2026 oilmarketcap. Designed by oilmarketcap.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.