Close Menu
  • Home
  • Market News
    • Crude Oil Prices
    • Brent vs WTI
    • Futures & Trading
    • OPEC Announcements
  • Company & Corporate
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Earnings Reports
    • Executive Moves
    • ESG & Sustainability
  • Geopolitical & Global
    • Middle East
    • North America
    • Europe & Russia
    • Asia & China
    • Latin America
  • Supply & Disruption
    • Pipeline Disruptions
    • Refinery Outages
    • Weather Events (hurricanes, floods)
    • Labor Strikes & Protest Movements
  • Policy & Regulation
    • U.S. Energy Policy
    • EU Carbon Targets
    • Emissions Regulations
    • International Trade & Sanctions
  • Tech
    • Energy Transition
    • Hydrogen & LNG
    • Carbon Capture
    • Battery / Storage Tech
  • ESG
    • Climate Commitments
    • Greenwashing News
    • Net-Zero Tracking
    • Institutional Divestments
  • Financial
    • Interest Rates Impact on Oil
    • Inflation + Demand
    • Oil & Stock Correlation
    • Investor Sentiment

Subscribe to Updates

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news

Subscribe my Newsletter for New Posts & tips Let's stay updated!

What's Hot

Uttarakhand High Court lifts 31-year-old Centre ban on contract workers in ONGC, ETEnergyworld

October 18, 2025

Oil set for weekly loss as global conflicts ease, signs of glut emerge, ETEnergyworld

October 18, 2025

Nigeria’s Dangote Refinery says crude inflow reduction driven by high prices, not faults, ETEnergyworld

October 18, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Threads
Oil Market Cap – Global Oil & Energy News, Data & Analysis
  • Home
  • Market News
    • Crude Oil Prices
    • Brent vs WTI
    • Futures & Trading
    • OPEC Announcements
  • Company & Corporate
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Earnings Reports
    • Executive Moves
    • ESG & Sustainability
  • Geopolitical & Global
    • Middle East
    • North America
    • Europe & Russia
    • Asia & China
    • Latin America
  • Supply & Disruption
    • Pipeline Disruptions
    • Refinery Outages
    • Weather Events (hurricanes, floods)
    • Labor Strikes & Protest Movements
  • Policy & Regulation
    • U.S. Energy Policy
    • EU Carbon Targets
    • Emissions Regulations
    • International Trade & Sanctions
  • Tech
    • Energy Transition
    • Hydrogen & LNG
    • Carbon Capture
    • Battery / Storage Tech
  • ESG
    • Climate Commitments
    • Greenwashing News
    • Net-Zero Tracking
    • Institutional Divestments
  • Financial
    • Interest Rates Impact on Oil
    • Inflation + Demand
    • Oil & Stock Correlation
    • Investor Sentiment
Oil Market Cap – Global Oil & Energy News, Data & Analysis
Home » Federal Reserve, FDIC Withdraw Climate Risk Rules for Large Banks
ESG & Sustainability

Federal Reserve, FDIC Withdraw Climate Risk Rules for Large Banks

omc_adminBy omc_adminOctober 17, 2025No Comments4 Mins Read
Share
Facebook Twitter Pinterest Threads Bluesky Copy Link


• The Federal Reserve, FDIC, and OCC have jointly rescinded the 2023 climate risk management principles for large financial institutions.
• Regulators said existing safety and soundness standards sufficiently address all material risks, including those related to climate.
• The decision marks a significant reversal from prior U.S. policy efforts to integrate climate risk into financial supervision.

Washington Pulls Back Climate Oversight for Financial Sector

The U.S. Federal Reserve, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) have formally withdrawn the Principles for Climate-Related Financial Risk Management for Large Financial Institutions, dissolving a framework introduced less than two years ago to help major banks assess climate-related threats to their balance sheets.

The rescission, effective immediately following publication in the Federal Register, eliminates joint guidance that had applied to institutions with over $100 billion in total assets. The principles, established in October 2023, were intended to guide banks in integrating climate considerations into governance, scenario analysis, and risk management.

In their joint statement, the agencies said they “do not believe principles for managing climate-related financial risk are necessary,” arguing that existing safety and soundness standards already require financial institutions to identify and address all material risks within their operating environments, including emerging ones.

Regulators Cite Duplication and Distraction

Officials maintained that climate risk frameworks could distract banks from other prudential obligations. “The Climate Principles may be distracting large financial institutions from the management of material financial risks,” the Federal Reserve said in an internal memo. The agencies emphasized that all supervised institutions must remain resilient to a wide range of potential risks—without the need for dedicated climate-specific oversight.

The withdrawal follows the OCC’s earlier decision to remove its participation from the principles and reflects a growing pivot within U.S. financial regulation away from climate-focused measures.

Political Reversal and Policy Context

The move comes amid broader policy realignments since the start of the Trump administration, which has taken steps to reverse climate-related commitments made under previous leadership. Shortly after the presidential inauguration, the Federal Reserve withdrew from the Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS)—a global coalition of central banks and supervisors coordinating on climate and green finance issues.

In a speech at the United Nations in September, President Trump described climate change as “the greatest con job ever perpetrated on the world,” setting the tone for a regulatory environment that deprioritizes climate integration in financial oversight.

The withdrawal of the climate principles effectively ends federal interagency coordination on climate financial risk, removing what had been one of the most structured attempts to standardize climate-related governance across U.S. banks.

RELATED ARTICLE: Fed to Launch Climate Risk Resilience Tests with Six of Nation’s Largest Banks

Dissent Within the Federal Reserve

The Fed Board voted 5–2 in favor of rescission. Governor Michael Barr, who opposed the withdrawal, criticized the decision as unjustified. “Revoking the principles as climate-related financial risks increase defies logic and sound risk management practices,” Barr said in a statement following the vote.

Governor Michael Barr

He added that the agencies provided “literally no evidence to support taking this step only two years after putting the principles into effect,” arguing that financial regulators “owe the public a rational, evidence-based explanation for our actions.”

Implications for Financial Institutions and Global Investors

For large banks, the immediate impact is regulatory uncertainty. While institutions remain bound by traditional prudential risk management rules, the absence of climate-specific expectations could complicate efforts to align with global disclosure and governance standards, such as those from the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) and the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD).

Global investors are also likely to view the move as further evidence of divergence between U.S. and international regulatory regimes on sustainable finance. European and Asian regulators continue to tighten climate risk disclosure and capital requirements, while the U.S. now shifts focus back toward conventional safety-and-soundness oversight.

A Step Back in Global Climate Finance Alignment

The decision widens the policy gap between Washington and jurisdictions integrating climate considerations into systemic financial stability frameworks. Without coordinated climate-risk oversight, U.S. banks operating internationally may face mismatched compliance obligations and reputational risk in global markets increasingly defined by ESG alignment.

For climate-focused investors and policymakers, the rescission marks a step back in embedding climate accountability into financial governance—an area that many international regulators consider fundamental to safeguarding long-term economic resilience.

As the agencies reaffirm traditional prudential oversight, questions remain over how the U.S. financial system will adapt to intensifying physical and transition risks driven by a changing climate—without a dedicated supervisory framework to measure and manage them.

Follow ESG News on LinkedIn



Source link

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest Bluesky Threads Tumblr Telegram Email
omc_admin
  • Website

Related Posts

Huawei, GoldenPeaks Capital Partner on 500MWh Grid-Forming Battery Projects in Europe

October 17, 2025

JPMorgan Chase, Carbon Direct Launch Framework to Link Biodiversity with Carbon Markets

October 17, 2025

Malaysia’s Rubber Industry Moves to Implement Net Zero Transition Framework

October 17, 2025
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Top Posts

LPG sales grow 5.1% in FY25, 43.6 lakh new customers enrolled, ET EnergyWorld

May 16, 20255 Views

South Sudan on edge as Sudan’s war threatens vital oil industry | Sudan war News

May 21, 20254 Views

Trump’s 100 days, AI bubble, volatility: Market Takeaways

December 16, 20072 Views
Don't Miss

Huawei, GoldenPeaks Capital Partner on 500MWh Grid-Forming Battery Projects in Europe

By omc_adminOctober 17, 2025

• GoldenPeaks Capital and Huawei sign a strategic MoU to deploy 500MWh of grid-forming battery…

JPMorgan Chase, Carbon Direct Launch Framework to Link Biodiversity with Carbon Markets

October 17, 2025

Malaysia’s Rubber Industry Moves to Implement Net Zero Transition Framework

October 17, 2025

Federal Reserve, FDIC Withdraw Climate Risk Rules for Large Banks

October 17, 2025
Top Trending

World’s oceans losing their greenness through global heating, study finds | Oceans

By omc_adminOctober 17, 2025

Shipping emissions levy shelved as countries bow to US pressure | Shipping emissions

By omc_adminOctober 17, 2025

Daylight Raises $75 Million to Turn Homes into Solar Power Plants

By omc_adminOctober 17, 2025
Most Popular

The Layoffs List of 2025: Meta, Microsoft, Block, and More

May 9, 20259 Views

Analysis: Reform-led councils threaten 6GW of solar and battery schemes across England

June 16, 20252 Views

Guest post: How ‘feedback loops’ and ‘non-linear thinking’ can inform climate policy

June 5, 20252 Views
Our Picks

Oil Ends Third Straight Weekly Loss

October 17, 2025

Colombia Warms to Fossil Fuels

October 17, 2025

EIA Raises USA Total Energy Consumption Forecasts

October 17, 2025

Subscribe to Updates

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news

Subscribe my Newsletter for New Posts & tips Let's stay updated!

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us
  • DMCA
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
© 2025 oilmarketcap. Designed by oilmarketcap.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.