Canada may be about to do something it hasn’t managed in nearly two decades: clear political space for a brand-new oil pipeline to the Pacific. Ottawa and Alberta are preparing to unveil a memorandum of understanding that would carve out exemptions to federal regulations that have long scared off investors — a move that, if it sticks, could rewire the outlook for Canadian crude exports.
The deal, as reported by Bloomberg, hinges on a trade: Alberta gets a pathway to coastal access, and Ottawa gets tougher carbon-pricing commitments and a multibillion-dollar push on carbon capture from the Pathways Alliance. In Canadian politics, that’s about as close to a grand bargain as the upstream sector is likely to see.
For energy markets, the significance is obvious. Canada produces more than 4 million barrels per day, ships almost all of it to the U.S., and has only a single coastal pipeline—Trans Mountain—which is already running full and took more than a decade, a court pileup, and C$34 billion to complete. A second major Pacific outlet would ease long-standing bottlenecks, temper Western Canadian Select discounts, and give producers leverage beyond the whims of U.S. refiners and U.S. trade policy.
But none of this happens in a vacuum. British Columbia’s premier is already signaling opposition, backed by Indigenous leaders who have fought (and won) pipeline battles before. Canadian courts have repeatedly forced federal regulators to redo homework on consultation, environmental impacts, and route approvals. It’s one reason Canada’s pipeline sector became a global case study in regulatory gridlock.
If Ottawa really is prepared to issue targeted carve-outs, it would mark the sharpest regulatory shift since the Trudeau-era tightening of the rules. Investors will want to know how durable that shift is, and whether any carve-out survives court challenges, political turnover, or changing market conditions.
By Julianne Geiger for Oilprice.com
More Top Reads From Oilprice.com
