Close Menu
  • Home
  • Market News
    • Crude Oil Prices
    • Brent vs WTI
    • Futures & Trading
    • OPEC Announcements
  • Company & Corporate
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Earnings Reports
    • Executive Moves
    • ESG & Sustainability
  • Geopolitical & Global
    • Middle East
    • North America
    • Europe & Russia
    • Asia & China
    • Latin America
  • Supply & Disruption
    • Pipeline Disruptions
    • Refinery Outages
    • Weather Events (hurricanes, floods)
    • Labor Strikes & Protest Movements
  • Policy & Regulation
    • U.S. Energy Policy
    • EU Carbon Targets
    • Emissions Regulations
    • International Trade & Sanctions
  • Tech
    • Energy Transition
    • Hydrogen & LNG
    • Carbon Capture
    • Battery / Storage Tech
  • ESG
    • Climate Commitments
    • Greenwashing News
    • Net-Zero Tracking
    • Institutional Divestments
  • Financial
    • Interest Rates Impact on Oil
    • Inflation + Demand
    • Oil & Stock Correlation
    • Investor Sentiment

Subscribe to Updates

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news

Subscribe my Newsletter for New Posts & tips Let's stay updated!

What's Hot

UK public finances on ‘unsustainable’ path amid growing climate, debt and pension costs | Economic policy

July 8, 2025

How Close Did Iran Come to Shutting Strait of Hormuz?

July 8, 2025

Can a $20bn refinery make Mexico’s energy ‘dream’ come true?

July 8, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Threads
Oil Market Cap – Global Oil & Energy News, Data & Analysis
  • Home
  • Market News
    • Crude Oil Prices
    • Brent vs WTI
    • Futures & Trading
    • OPEC Announcements
  • Company & Corporate
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Earnings Reports
    • Executive Moves
    • ESG & Sustainability
  • Geopolitical & Global
    • Middle East
    • North America
    • Europe & Russia
    • Asia & China
    • Latin America
  • Supply & Disruption
    • Pipeline Disruptions
    • Refinery Outages
    • Weather Events (hurricanes, floods)
    • Labor Strikes & Protest Movements
  • Policy & Regulation
    • U.S. Energy Policy
    • EU Carbon Targets
    • Emissions Regulations
    • International Trade & Sanctions
  • Tech
    • Energy Transition
    • Hydrogen & LNG
    • Carbon Capture
    • Battery / Storage Tech
  • ESG
    • Climate Commitments
    • Greenwashing News
    • Net-Zero Tracking
    • Institutional Divestments
  • Financial
    • Interest Rates Impact on Oil
    • Inflation + Demand
    • Oil & Stock Correlation
    • Investor Sentiment
Oil Market Cap – Global Oil & Energy News, Data & Analysis
Home » Apple Can’t Quit China Despite Mounting Trump Pressure, Analysts Say
U.S. Energy Policy

Apple Can’t Quit China Despite Mounting Trump Pressure, Analysts Say

omc_adminBy omc_adminJuly 8, 2025No Comments4 Mins Read
Share
Facebook Twitter Pinterest Threads Bluesky Copy Link


The Trump administration is losing patience with Apple’s slow progress in moving operations out of China. However, the iPhone maker looks increasingly stuck in China, according to Wall Street analysts.

On Monday, Trump’s trade advisor Peter Navarro ripped into Apple’s manufacturing strategy on CNBC, calling it “inconceivable” that Apple hadn’t been able to move its factories out of China over the last few years.

“Going back to the first Trump term, Tim Cook has continually asked for more time in order to move his factories out of China,” Navarro said. “And my problem with Tim Cook is he never takes the steps to actually do that.”

“And with all these new advanced manufacturing techniques and the way things are moving with AI and things like that, it’s inconceivable to me that Tim Cook could not produce his iPhones elsewhere around the world and in this country,” Navarro added.

Earlier this year, Apple CEO Tim Cook announced plans for a $500 billion investment into US projects over the next four years, including adding 20,000 US jobs, a manufacturing facility in Houston, and increased R&D spending. During Trump’s first term, Apple also committed $430 billion in US investments.

As Apple faces mounting pressure from the Trump administration to pivot from China, Wall Street analysts aren’t that optimistic that the company can pull it off without incurring serious costs.

First, there are higher labor costs associated with manufacturing domestically. Manufacturing domestically doesn’t spare Apple from paying reciprocal tariffs to import sub-assemblies into the country, either. Wamsi Mohan, research analyst at Bank of America, estimates that iPhone costs could increase 25% from labor costs alone, and over 90% after factoring import fees.

If Apple were to increase manufacturing in the US, Mohan believes it would be limited to the final assembly process.

“Moving the entire iPhone supply chain would be a much bigger undertaking and would likely take many years, if even possible,” Mohan wrote in an April note.

Erik Woodring, a research analyst at Morgan Stanley, said it would take over two years to build an assembly facility. It would also require over 100,000 employees highly skilled in precise tooling equipment, and the first US-assembled iPhone might not be available until after Trump’s term.

One option for Apple to mitigate tariff risk is to source more products from India and Vietnam, which it has been doing ever since the pandemic. But the Trump administration’s recent pushback indicates that the government is looking for a firmer commitment to reshoring to the US instead of “friendshoring.”

Related stories

Business Insider tells the innovative stories you want to know

Business Insider tells the innovative stories you want to know

In May, Trump threatened a 25% tariff on iPhone imports. Woodring believes that wouldn’t be enough to offset the increased costs of domestic manufacturing.

“The time to market would be too long, and the costs associated with building an iPhone in the US would be too high relative to the incremental cost burden of a 25% tariff,” Woodring wrote in a May note.

This puts Apple and Cook in a tough spot, but it’s unclear what level of tariffs would tilt the cost-benefit analysis in favor of domestic production.

“Apple’s defiance […] risks further tariff escalation (is a 50% tariff enough to shift production to the US?),” Woodring wrote.

Additionally, pulling its factories out of China could be its own key business risk. China has been one of the company’s biggest growth engines in the past decade.

While exposure to China leaves Apple vulnerable to regulation from Beijing, moving production away from China could be a blow to Apple’s largest market outside of the Americas as well.

“Apple moving production out could irk China too, causing potential subtle retaliation (like slow customs clearance, labor inspections, etc., to make life hard for Apple’s remaining China ops),” Mohan wrote in June.

“While Apple is diversifying (targeting ~25% of iPhones made outside China by 2025), China will likely remain indispensable for years — it still has the unrivaled manufacturing scale and skilled labor for complex devices,” Mohan added.

No matter how you spin it, Apple’s existing business model is deeply entrenched in China. The iPhone maker is in an uncomfortable position, facing steep consequences whether it stays in or leaves China.



Source link

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest Bluesky Threads Tumblr Telegram Email
omc_admin
  • Website

Related Posts

Amazon Prime Day Is a Great Time to Test Rufus AI Shopping Assisttant

July 8, 2025

Samsung’s Profit Plunge Shows How Far It Has Slipped in the Chip War

July 8, 2025

Open Letter to Sequoia Capital Over Partner Calling Mamdani ‘Islamist’

July 8, 2025
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Top Posts

LPG sales grow 5.1% in FY25, 43.6 lakh new customers enrolled, ET EnergyWorld

May 16, 20255 Views

South Sudan on edge as Sudan’s war threatens vital oil industry | Sudan war News

May 21, 20253 Views

Trump’s 100 days, AI bubble, volatility: Market Takeaways

December 16, 20072 Views
Don't Miss

How Close Did Iran Come to Shutting Strait of Hormuz?

By omc_adminJuly 8, 2025

It appears that Iran was not very close to trying to block shipping through the…

Can a $20bn refinery make Mexico’s energy ‘dream’ come true?

July 8, 2025

BP and Shell sign Libya deals as majors accelerate return after civil war

July 8, 2025

African Energy Chamber condemns Greenpeace for ‘calculated attacks’ to hinder energy development

July 8, 2025
Top Trending

UK public finances on ‘unsustainable’ path amid growing climate, debt and pension costs | Economic policy

By omc_adminJuly 8, 2025

Deadly floods could be new normal as Trump guts federal agencies, experts warn | Texas floods 2025

By omc_adminJuly 8, 2025

CapitaLand Launches New Framework to Quantify the Financial Return of Sustainability Investments

By omc_adminJuly 8, 2025
Most Popular

The 5 Best Soundbars of 2025

May 6, 20251 Views

Energy Department Lifts Regulations on Miscellaneous Gas Products

May 2, 20251 Views

Apple Can’t Quit China Despite Mounting Trump Pressure, Analysts Say

July 8, 20250 Views
Our Picks

EnerMech Bags Triton FPSO Work

July 8, 2025

Valaris Secures New Works for Two of Its Drillships

July 8, 2025

Petronas Strengthens Partnerships for Sabah Oil and Gas Developments

July 8, 2025

Subscribe to Updates

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news

Subscribe my Newsletter for New Posts & tips Let's stay updated!

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us
  • DMCA
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
© 2025 oilmarketcap. Designed by oilmarketcap.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.