Close Menu
  • Home
  • Market News
    • Crude Oil Prices
    • Brent vs WTI
    • Futures & Trading
    • OPEC Announcements
  • Company & Corporate
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Earnings Reports
    • Executive Moves
    • ESG & Sustainability
  • Geopolitical & Global
    • Middle East
    • North America
    • Europe & Russia
    • Asia & China
    • Latin America
  • Supply & Disruption
    • Pipeline Disruptions
    • Refinery Outages
    • Weather Events (hurricanes, floods)
    • Labor Strikes & Protest Movements
  • Policy & Regulation
    • U.S. Energy Policy
    • EU Carbon Targets
    • Emissions Regulations
    • International Trade & Sanctions
  • Tech
    • Energy Transition
    • Hydrogen & LNG
    • Carbon Capture
    • Battery / Storage Tech
  • ESG
    • Climate Commitments
    • Greenwashing News
    • Net-Zero Tracking
    • Institutional Divestments
  • Financial
    • Interest Rates Impact on Oil
    • Inflation + Demand
    • Oil & Stock Correlation
    • Investor Sentiment

Subscribe to Updates

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news

Subscribe my Newsletter for New Posts & tips Let's stay updated!

What's Hot

Ferrari lifts the hood on EV tech in maiden electric car

October 9, 2025

Citigroup Flags Oil Market’s Bearish Consensus

October 9, 2025

IEA: Renewables have cut fossil-fuel imports for more than 100 countries

October 9, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Threads
Oil Market Cap – Global Oil & Energy News, Data & Analysis
  • Home
  • Market News
    • Crude Oil Prices
    • Brent vs WTI
    • Futures & Trading
    • OPEC Announcements
  • Company & Corporate
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Earnings Reports
    • Executive Moves
    • ESG & Sustainability
  • Geopolitical & Global
    • Middle East
    • North America
    • Europe & Russia
    • Asia & China
    • Latin America
  • Supply & Disruption
    • Pipeline Disruptions
    • Refinery Outages
    • Weather Events (hurricanes, floods)
    • Labor Strikes & Protest Movements
  • Policy & Regulation
    • U.S. Energy Policy
    • EU Carbon Targets
    • Emissions Regulations
    • International Trade & Sanctions
  • Tech
    • Energy Transition
    • Hydrogen & LNG
    • Carbon Capture
    • Battery / Storage Tech
  • ESG
    • Climate Commitments
    • Greenwashing News
    • Net-Zero Tracking
    • Institutional Divestments
  • Financial
    • Interest Rates Impact on Oil
    • Inflation + Demand
    • Oil & Stock Correlation
    • Investor Sentiment
Oil Market Cap – Global Oil & Energy News, Data & Analysis
Home » Department of Energy Overhauls Policy for College and University Research, Saving $405 Million Annually for American Taxpayers
U.S. Energy Policy

Department of Energy Overhauls Policy for College and University Research, Saving $405 Million Annually for American Taxpayers

omc_adminBy omc_adminApril 11, 2025No Comments5 Mins Read
Share
Facebook Twitter Pinterest Threads Bluesky Copy Link


WASHINGTON– The Department of Energy (DOE) today announced a new policy action aimed at halting inefficient spending by colleges and universities while continuing to expand American innovation and scientific research. In a new policy memorandum shared with grant recipients at colleges and universities, DOE announced that it will limit financial support of “indirect costs” of DOE research funding to 15%. This action is projected to generate over $405 million in annual cost savings for the American people, delivering on President Trump’s commitment to bring greater transparency and efficiency to federal government spending.

“The purpose of Department of Energy funding to colleges and universities is to support scientific research – not foot the bill for administrative costs and facility upgrades,” U.S. Secretary of Energy Chris Wright said. “With President Trump’s leadership, we are ensuring every dollar of taxpayer funding is being used efficiently to support research and innovation – saving millions for the American people.”

Through its grant programs, the Department provides over $2.5 billion annually to more than 300 colleges and universities to support Department-sanctioned research. A portion of the funding goes to “indirect costs”, which include both facilities and administration costs.

According to DOE data, the average rate of indirect costs incurred by grant recipients at colleges and universities is more than 30%, a significantly higher rate than other for profit, non-profit and state and local government grant awardees. Limiting these costs to a standard rate of 15% will help improve efficiency, reduce costs and ensure proper stewardship of American taxpayer dollars.

Full memorandum is available here:

POLICY FLASH

DATE: April 11, 2025

SUBJECT: Adjusting Department of Energy Grant Policy for Institutions of Higher Education (IHE) 

BACKGROUND: Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(2), the Department of Energy (“Department”) is updating its policy with respect to Department grants awarded to institutions of higher education (IHEs).

Through its grant programs, the Department funds Department-sanctioned research. A portion of the funding goes to “indirect costs”, which include both facilities and administration costs. See 2 C.F.R. 200.414(a). “Facilities costs” comprise “depreciation on buildings, equipment and capital improvements, and operations and maintenance expenses,” while “administration costs” are “general administration and [other] general expenses,” like funding for “the director’s office, accounting, [and] personnel.” Id.

While the Department is cognizant that many grant recipients use indirect cost payments to effectuate research funded by the Department’s grant awards, these payments are not for the Department’s direct research funding. See 89 Fed. Reg. 30046-30093. As these funds are entrusted to the Department by the American people, the Department must ensure it is putting them to appropriate use on grant programs. To improve efficiency and curtail costs where appropriate, the Department seeks to better balance the financial needs of grant recipients with the Department’s obligation to responsibly manage federal funds.

This memorandum accordingly sets forth the Department’s updated policies, procedures, and general decision-making criteria for establishing indirect cost rates when awarding grants to IHEs; these policies, procedures, and criteria are intended to better balance the Department’s dual responsibilities to grant recipients and the American people.
The Department is initially taking this action only with respect to IHEs. See 2 C.F.R. 200.414(c)(1); id. 200.1.

ESTABLISHING APPROPRIATE INDIRECT COST RATES: 

At present, the Department’s indirect cost rate for IHE grants is typically negotiated by either “the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) or the Department of Defense’s Office of Naval Research (DOD), normally depending on which of the two agencies (HHS or DOD) provide[d] more funds to the [relevant] educational institution for the most recent three years.” 2 C.F.R. pt. 200, app. III(C)(11)(a)(1). Though the Department generally must accept this negotiated rate, see 2 C.F.R. 200.414(c)(1), it may deviate therefrom for “a class of Federal awards” after implementing and making publicly available “the policies, procedures and general decision-making criteria” it will follow when seeking and justifying deviations. Id. 200.414(c)(1), (3). A “class of Federal awards” is defined to include “a group of Federal awards . . . to a specific type of recipient or group of recipients,” such as grants to IHEs—the class relevant to this policy update. Id. 200.1.

For the reasons set forth in this memorandum, hereinafter, the Department will no longer use the negotiated indirect cost rate for grants awarded to IHEs. Instead, it is setting a standardized 15 percent indirect cost rate for all grant awards to IHEs. This is at the high end of the “up to 15 percent” de minimis rate permitted by government-wide regulation. See, e.g., 2 C.F.R. 200.414(f). Consistent with this memorandum, the Department is undertaking action to terminate all grant awards to IHEs that do not conform with this updated policy. See 2 C.F.R. 200.340(a), (b). Recipients subject to termination will receive separate notice and guidance.

All future Department grant awards to IHEs will default to this 15 percent indirect cost rate. This system will better balance the Department’s twin aims of funding meaningful research and upholding its fiduciary duties to the American people.

Additional information is forthcoming.

This flash will be available online at the Department of Energy Policy Flashes website.



Source link

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest Bluesky Threads Tumblr Telegram Email
omc_admin
  • Website

Related Posts

ChatGPT Users Now Make up 10% of the World’s Adult Population

October 9, 2025

Sensi.AI Raised $45 Million for Home Health AI With This Pitch Deck

October 9, 2025

BCG Says Only 5% of Companies Are Seeing Value From AI. Here’s Why.

October 9, 2025
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Top Posts

LPG sales grow 5.1% in FY25, 43.6 lakh new customers enrolled, ET EnergyWorld

May 16, 20255 Views

South Sudan on edge as Sudan’s war threatens vital oil industry | Sudan war News

May 21, 20254 Views

Trump’s 100 days, AI bubble, volatility: Market Takeaways

December 16, 20072 Views
Don't Miss

Permian emissions fall 20% since 2022 even as output rises, new study finds

By omc_adminOctober 9, 2025

(WO) — Greenhouse gas emissions from the Permian Basin have declined nearly 20% since 2022…

Air New Zealand Invests in New Zealand Nature through First Verified Carbon Removals

October 9, 2025

Sembcorp Expands Indian Renewables Portfolio with $190M ReNew Solar Acquisition

October 9, 2025

EU Carmakers Urge Softer CO₂ Targets, Greater Role for Hybrids and E-Fuels

October 9, 2025
Top Trending

Google Rolls Out Carbon Footprint Reporting for Advertisers

By omc_adminOctober 9, 2025

Carlyle, CalSTRS to Co-Invest in Climate Solutions

By omc_adminOctober 9, 2025

EU Parliament Lawmakers Reach Deal on Bigger Cuts to Sustainability Reporting and Due Diligence Laws

By omc_adminOctober 9, 2025
Most Popular

The Layoffs List of 2025: Meta, Microsoft, Block, and More

May 9, 20259 Views

Analysis: Reform-led councils threaten 6GW of solar and battery schemes across England

June 16, 20252 Views

Guest post: How ‘feedback loops’ and ‘non-linear thinking’ can inform climate policy

June 5, 20252 Views
Our Picks

Citigroup Flags Oil Market’s Bearish Consensus

October 9, 2025

Uniper Inks 7-Year Deal for Biomethane Supply from Spain

October 9, 2025

BMI Flags Trends It Says Will Shape Future of Oil, Gas

October 9, 2025

Subscribe to Updates

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news

Subscribe my Newsletter for New Posts & tips Let's stay updated!

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us
  • DMCA
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
© 2025 oilmarketcap. Designed by oilmarketcap.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.