A new draft text on the outcome of the Cop30 climate talks that contains no mention of a phase-out of fossil fuels was published on Friday morning, despite countries supporting such action having threatened to block any agreement without it.
The Guardian revealed on Thursday night that at least 29 nations supporting a phase-out of fossil fuels at the climate summit had sent a letter to the Brazilian Cop presidency threatening to block any agreement that did not include such a commitment, in a significant escalation of tensions at the crunch talks. The leaked letter demanded that the roadmap be included in the outcome of the talks, which are due to end on Friday but are likely to continue into the weekend.
An option to start the process of drawing up a potential roadmap for the “transition away from fossil fuels” was included in the first draft of a potential outcome from the two weeks of talks, published on Tuesday. But early on Friday morning, a “mutirão” text was published by the presidency which contained no mention of the roadmap, and no mention of the term “fossil fuels”.
It was not immediately clear how countries would respond to the proposal, but the Guardian understands Brazil faced pressure from some petrostates – including Saudi Arabia, Russia and some large fossil fuel consumers including India – to omit the potential resolution.
Some of the countries opposing the roadmap had threatened to walk out of the talks on Thursday, before a fire broke out in part of the conference centre near the delegations’ offices and talks were suspended for more than six hours.
A letter to the presidency seen by the Guardian shows that many of the governments in favour of a roadmap have set it as a “red line” for the talks.
It reads: “We cannot support an outcome that does not include a roadmap for implementing a just, orderly, and equitable transition away from fossil fuels. This expectation is shared by a vast majority of Parties, as well as by science and by the people who are watching our work closely. The world is looking to this Cop to demonstrate continuity and progress after the Global Stocktake. Anything less would inevitably be seen as a step backward.”
The global stocktake refers to the historic decision made at Cop28 in Dubai in 2023, which set out for the first time a pledge by all countries to “transition away from fossil fuels”, but set out no timeline for the transition and no measures on how to achieve it.
Since that commitment was signed, some countries – chiefly Saudi Arabia – have tried to unpick it. In 2024, at the Cop29 talks in Azerbaijan, an attempt to reconfirm the commitment failed in the face of opposition.
This year, countries in favour of the phase-out took a different tack. Some started to draw up proposals for a forum in which all countries could take part, to discuss a possible roadmap for the transition. This would not require any country to sign up to a firm deadline for a phase-out, and would allow all countries to choose their own policies and pathways. The roadmap would not be completed at this Cop but would take at least a year or more of work at future Cops to be fully articulated.
More than 80 countries joined the initiative, and held a press conference on Tuesday to announce their plans.
But this was too much for the countries that are still opposed to such a commitment, led by some members of a group known as the “like-minded developing countries”, a loose grouping which includes Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Iran and Bolivia.
The planet’s most important stories. Get all the week’s environment news – the good, the bad and the essential
Privacy Notice: Newsletters may contain information about charities, online ads, and content funded by outside parties. If you do not have an account, we will create a guest account for you on theguardian.com to send you this newsletter. You can complete full registration at any time. For more information about how we use your data see our Privacy Policy. We use Google reCaptcha to protect our website and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
after newsletter promotion
The Guardian understands that the signatories to the letter in favour of the phase-out of fossil fuels include: Austria, Belgium, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Croatia, Czechia, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Guatemala, Honduras, Iceland, Ireland, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, the Marshall Islands, México, Monaco, the Netherlands, Panamá, Palau, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom and Vanuatu.
Irene Velez Torres, the environment minister of Colombia, told the Guardian: “The letter emerged after the presidency presented a ‘take-it-or-leave-it’ text that we believe is insufficient for the level of ambition and implementation this Cop must deliver – particularly regarding the need, clearly backed by science and by people around the world, for a roadmap to phase out fossil fuels.
“This Cop’s success cannot be measured by adopting a text at any cost. The true success of this Cop lies in the quality of the outcome. Adopting a weak or empty text would signal a failure of climate multilateralism and a failure to future generations, who deserve a livable planet.”
Catherine Abreu, director of the International Climate Politics Hub, said: “It’s clear that a growing group won’t leave Belém without an ambitious package deal built on four cornerstones: money for adaptation, better quality and accountability for climate finance, a clear focus on tackling the biggest sources of climate pollution – fossil fuels and deforestation – and a commitment to drive it all with a just transition.
“… The question is whether the Brazil presidency will choose to listen to them, with time running out.”
The fortnight of talks in Belém are scheduled to end on Friday evening but were delayed by the fire, which caused some damage to the venue but in which no one was hurt, and are likely to carry on into the weekend.
As the talks reach their final hours, the row over the transition away from fossil fuels is likely to dominate, but other issues also remain to be resolved, including a response to the fact that countries’ national climate plans are too weak to limit global heating to 1.5C above preindustrial levels as set out in the 2015 Paris agreement, and questions of finance, trade and transparency, and how much cash developing countries will receive to help them adapt to the impacts of the climate crisis.
