Meta says all its data centers and offices now match 100% of electricity use with clean and renewable energy and meet LEED Gold certification or higher.
The company has contracted more than 15 gigawatts of renewable energy and is expanding projects across the U.S. to power AI-focused infrastructure.
Rising AI-driven compute demand is expected to increase grid strain and emissions exposure, creating new governance and risk challenges for investors and regulators.
Building America’s AI Infrastructure
From Menlo Park to the Midwest, Meta is building the backbone of its artificial intelligence ambitions through a network of advanced data centers. These facilities, crucial for powering the company’s platforms and future AI models, have become central to U.S. infrastructure and climate policy debates.
Meta plans to invest more than $600 billion in the U.S. by 2028 to expand its data center network, strengthen grid infrastructure, and support local economies. The scale of that investment makes the company a major player not only in the digital economy but also in the transition toward cleaner energy and modernized utilities.
Renewable Power and Grid Integration
Meta reports that all its data centers are powered by renewable electricity through long-term contracts with new wind, solar, and geothermal projects. Since 2020, the company has secured more than 15 gigawatts of clean energy worldwide, with U.S. projects concentrated in states like Texas, Ohio, and Iowa.
New geothermal facilities in New Mexico are being designed to deliver carbon-free energy with zero operating water use. Meta’s approach to energy procurement has also helped fund upgrades to grid infrastructure and incentivize utilities to expand renewables portfolios.
For institutional investors, the takeaway is clear: corporate energy purchasing is now a structural driver of grid modernization and regional economic development.
Meta’s data centers are certified at LEED Gold or higher, with construction waste diversion rates above 90% and growing adoption of low-carbon concrete. The company is also targeting water positivity by 2030, restoring more water to local watersheds than it consumes.
On average, Meta’s facilities operate at a power usage effectiveness of 1.08—significantly lower than the industry norm—and a water usage effectiveness of 0.18. The company’s design standards emphasize dry cooling and localized efficiency measures, particularly in water-stressed regions.
For sustainability professionals, these metrics illustrate how operational design can reduce both environmental risk and long-term operating costs, particularly as energy and water pressures rise.
RELATED ARTICLE: Meta Replaces Steel, Concrete with Mass Timber for Sustainable Data Center Construction
The Governance Challenge
Despite rapid progress, Meta faces a tension between its clean-energy claims and the broader impact of AI-driven growth. Analysts note that while Meta matches its energy use with renewables, many of its data centers still draw from regional grids heavily reliant on fossil fuels. The result is that local emissions may not always decline even when renewable credits are purchased.
A 2024 study found that U.S. data centers consumed over 4% of the nation’s electricity in 2023 and generated an estimated 105 million tonnes of CO₂ equivalent—more than 2% of total U.S. emissions. As AI workloads accelerate, those numbers are expected to grow.
This exposes investors and executives to a new class of ESG risks: regional grid dependency, water scarcity, and community-level environmental justice. It also places greater scrutiny on how companies integrate climate scenarios and physical risk management into their infrastructure strategy.
Lessons for C-Suite and Investors
For decision-makers, Meta’s buildout highlights three key insights.
Infrastructure is now ESG-critical. Data centers are both assets and emissions sources; their design, location, and energy mix directly affect corporate carbon profiles.
Governance must evolve. Energy matching is no longer enough. Transparency around grid mix, embodied carbon, and regional impacts will become the next frontier of ESG reporting.
System thinking is essential. Hyperscale infrastructure influences everything from labor markets to power generation. Investors and policy-makers must assess not just enterprise-level sustainability, but system-level outcomes.
Global Implications
What Meta is building in the U.S. will define the blueprint for digital infrastructure worldwide. As other technology and cloud companies scale AI capacity across Europe, Asia, and Latin America, they will face similar challenges: balancing growth with grid capacity, renewable availability, and community resilience.
For ESG professionals, the message is straightforward—digital infrastructure is no longer a peripheral climate issue. It is now one of the defining arenas where technology, capital, and sustainability converge.
Follow ESG News on LinkedIn
